Premier League neutral grounds plan opposed by Watford chief
The plans to
resume Premier League season at neutral venues has been opposed by the CEO of
Premier League club, Watford. The CEO of Watford football club, Scott Duxbury
said the plans are unfair and that there could be enough clubs in the
opposition to stop the idea.
The Premier
League plans to resume in June, once given the green light from government,
with the remaining 92 matches to be held behind closed doors at neutral venues.
According to
Scott Duxbury, at least six clubs are against the plans-14 of the 20 need to
vote in favour for the proposals to be agreed.
Watford, who
are 17th in the league and only above the relegation zone on goals
difference, defeated runway leaders Liverpool in a shock victory at their
Vicarage Road ground in February. Scott said the result was influenced by home
advantage.
Watford
chief wrote in The Times on Saturday: “We are now told we cannot play our
remaining home games at Vicarage Road and the familiarity and advantage that
brings.
With all
these compromises and health risks we are asked to finish a competition that
bears no resemblance to the one we started, which could end a small club like
Watford’s time in the Premier League.
So is this
fair? Does it have any semblance of sporting integrity? Of course not.
The German
Bundesliga will resume play on May 16th with home and away fixtures.
They have
found a way to implement all the proposals we have been talking about in our Premier
League meetings without the need to resort to return to neutral venues.
Critics will
say my position is founded on self-interest and they would be absolutely right.
I have a duty to protect my club and the people employed by it, some of whom
have worked for Watford Football Club for more than 20 years and dedicated
their lives to it.
There is no
altruism in the Premier League. There are 20 different vested interests, which
sometimes align but more often than work purely to protect each individual
club.
Opposition
to the idea, reported to be mainly from teams facing a relegation battle, means
the league should rethink.
How can the
long-term future of clubs be determined under these fundamentally changed
conditions? How is there any semblance of fairness? To wave aside all the fears
and concerns is too simplistic. Surely all 20 clubs must agree the fairest way
forward to complete the season.”
Comments
Post a Comment